Jump to content

EngrJunaid

Member
  • Posts

    62
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

EngrJunaid last won the day on November 14 2021

EngrJunaid had the most liked content!

3 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Peshawar
  • University
    UET Lahore
  • Employer
    Peshawar HealthCare Pvt ltd
  • Interests
    Design of Structures

Recent Profile Visitors

3339 profile views

EngrJunaid's Achievements

  1. W.Salaam sir, If the specimen length to diameter ratio is 1.75 or less, Correction factor mentioned in ASTM-C39 will be applied. Please see the snapshot attached.
  2. Dear Kel, My comments based on a very quick review to your attached model are; 1)-Your load transfer issue is because you have provided joint fixity to each beam column joint at all floor level. By making all floor levels beam column joints free and fixing column at foundation level only will resolve your issue. 2)-Your model is showing more warnings of elements too close also. 3)-I would suggest you to improve your modelling, analysis, design and detailing skills in guidance of your in house seniors. Regards
  3. Have a look to field practicing manual prepared after the 2005 Earthquake.
  4. @jay olleta Code specify to use I*g/R value as initial scale factor. But the simple way is to Initially take the scale factor equal to 1000. Then run the analysis and check/compare the Static and dynamic base shear and update the scale factor accordingly. If Static Base shear is greater than Dynamic Base shear, you will need to scale up the dynamic Base Shear and if Static Base shear is less than Dynamic Base shear, you will need to scale down the dynamic Base Shear as follows: New Scale Factor=1000*(Static Base Shear/Dynamic Base Shear) See the UBC code pic attached for the minimum limit of reduction of elastic Response Parameters.
  5. Dear @Saiful Islam Zaber Please see this link https://wiki.csiamerica.com/display/kb/Pattern+live-load+factor and the picture attached. Hope this will suffice your query.
  6. Include the wall in your model but play with wall stiffness modifier in order make it retaining wall. i.e use F12=0.001 to neglect the inplane stiffness of the wall.
  7. The warning/error you are getting in ETABS shows that there is no line element in your model, only shell (area) elements and you are trying to display frame/pier forces etc.... Go to Display for displayinh shell stresses/forces... Share more detail about the subject model like base dimensions, height etc and a plane of your model/structure.
  8. Yes you have to scale down as per 1631.5.4 (screenshot attached).
  9. Wall Load per running foot = (Wall ht.)(Wall Thickness)(Unit wt.) Suppose you have 9inch thick wall of ht. 12ft and unit wt. of clay masonry brick is 120lb/cft. Wall Load/Rft =(12)(0.75)((120)=1080 lb/ft =1.08kip/ft Line load would not be assigned directly to area element (slab,wall). So assign a dummy beam and apply line load to this dummy beam.
  10. How to evaluate Vibrations in vehicle parking Reinforced Concrete building ?? Any code reference or procedure ???
  11. The quick method to check weather the design of slender column is fine or need to increase the column size are as follows; 1- In order to get the moments along column height accurately, divide the column into 2 or 3 segments. 2- Apply modifier. 3- Activate the P-Delta option from define menu. 4- Run the analysis and design with P-Delta and check the Non sway magnification factor i.e. delta(ns) in design summary of the column (see the pic attached). This delta(ns) must be less than 1.4. If this exceeds the limit of 1.4, increase the column size otherwise the column design is OK. Correction by seniors in my above steps will be highly appreciated.
  12. Sorry I replied in my previous comment regarding the application of copy, paste and replicate etc commands. hmmm now i get your point that you are worry about the copy, paste replicate etc short cut commands...... I checked both v13 & v16. These commands works in v13 and thats why they are shown there also. But these short cut commands are neither shown in v16 nor working there.
  13. But some times there are bugs in the very latest versions. I would recommend not to use the very latest version. I usually use v13 for designing but also use the latest version for checking and application of new features of new versions.
  14. Your model is LOCK, first unlock your model then they all will work smoothly.
  15. If you are fine with all other serviceability checks then consider the torsion in your vertical member design. But keep your eyes on the separation gap between the blocks. The gap must be sufficient enough to avoid pounding action. You may run real time history (linear model) on your model for deciding the separation gap.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.