Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'minimum reinforcement ratio'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • Member Introduction
    • Shout Box
    • Students Zone
    • Engineering Marvels & Disasters
  • Civil/ Structural Engineering
    • General Discussion
    • Steel Design
    • Concrete Design
    • Seismic Design
    • Foundation Design
    • Software Issues
    • Journal/ Articles/ Tutorials
    • Spreadsheets & Softwares
  • Technical Support
    • Website Announcements/ Problems/ Login/ Registration Issues
  • PSX Stocks Investing's Topics
  • Parenting's Topics
  • Construction Consulting's Industrial Construction Project
  • Construction Consulting's Piling

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • Construction Consulting's Piling

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Skype


Location


University


Employer


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. Hello Fellow Engineers. Well I do Know that, Etabs Checks all the members for there minimum area of Reinforcement as per code. But I came across one design of mine where I see for a beam size of 228.6 mm wide and 304.8 mm deep. Etabs gives Bottom reinforcement less than what I calculated manually. I am attaching a few pics for the problem. I request to please put some light on this. The beam is designed for M20 and Fe 415 steel.
  2. Dears; The minimum steel ratio =0.0018 is for one face or for the 2 faces of the section (top & bottom)?? As far as I know that 0.0018 is for the face exposed to tension (not the 2 faces). Since the Mat suffers tension at top and bottom of the section at the same section so we provide 0.0018 for 2 faces . Am I right??? Regards
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.