Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'structural modelling'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • Member Introduction
    • Shout Box
    • Students Zone
    • Engineering Marvels & Disasters
  • Civil/ Structural Engineering
    • General Discussion
    • Steel Design
    • Concrete Design
    • Seismic Design
    • Foundation Design
    • Software Issues
    • Journal/ Articles/ Tutorials
    • Spreadsheets & Softwares
  • Technical Support
    • Website Announcements/ Problems/ Login/ Registration Issues
  • PSX Stocks Investing's Topics
  • Parenting's Topics
  • Construction Consulting's Industrial Construction Project
  • Construction Consulting's Piling

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • Construction Consulting's Piling

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Skype


Location


University


Employer


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. Greetings! I am quite confused as to whether elements below grade (i.e. ground beams, columns extending to footings, tie beams, etc.) should be modelled in ETABS/STAAD. I have seen quite a few people consider these elements in their models (making the base of the model coincide with the top of the footing), while others prefer to do the opposite (base coincides with the ground floor level). So, my questions are: 1. Should these underground elements be modelled, analyzed, and designed separately? 2. What should the modelling approach be when it comes to buildings with basements? And to high-rise structures? 3. What are the pros and cons of modelling or not modelling these elements? Your insights into this topic are very much appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.