Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Recommended Posts

Dear friends, 

 

Can any body share some examples on dynamic analysis to calculate earthquake forces on buildings.

Need information how to make number of modes and what should be the scale factor?

 

 

Regards

Sohaib

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

In modal analysis, I have heard that first 3 modes are important and should be considered. Rest are unimportant. Is that the case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends upon what kind of analysis you are doing and what parameters are you looking for, e.g. If you are checking pump vibrations on a steel skid, it doesnt matter what your modal mass participation is and what your primary modes are. All you care is what modes fall closer to the forcing function that would resonate the pump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Correct I am wrong. As per UBC # of modes shall be such that it incorporates 90% of participating mass. If participating mass is 90% in first two modes then no need of other modes. If 90% is acheiving in first 6 modes then first 6 modes are sufficient. If 90% is not acheiving then you have to scale your spectrum. In STAAD add missing mass value.

Also, I have worked on STAAD mostly. If you require STAAD model then i can attach it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ahmed Waqar said:

Correct I am wrong. As per UBC # of modes shall be such that it incorporates 90% of participating mass. If participating mass is 90% in first two modes then no need of other modes. If 90% is acheiving in first 6 modes then first 6 modes are sufficient. If 90% is not acheiving then you have to scale your spectrum. In STAAD add missing mass value.

 

Your understanding is correct.

The higher mass participation, the important the mode. Once you have figured out which modes have the greatest mass participation, take time to see the mode/ demformed shape and think about how can you improve your structural framing. 

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
On 3/27/2016 at 11:28 AM, Ahmed Waqar said:

If 90% is acheiving in first 6 modes then first 6 modes are sufficient. If 90% is not acheiving then you have to scale your spectrum.

No, scaling is for dynamic base shear. Scaling will not increase mass participation. If 90% is not achieved you have to include more mass, that means increase the number of modes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rana said:

No, scaling is for dynamic base shear. Scaling will not increase mass participation. If 90% is not achieved you have to include more mass, that means increase the number of modes.

Good that you clarified, but the original statement also includes - "Correct I am wrong. As per UBC # of modes shall be such that it incorporates 90% of participating mass."

 

Edited by Ayesha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2014 at 3:09 AM, UmarMakhzumi said:

I have attached tutorials that will show you how to setup ETABS model for dynamic analysis. Go through all tutorials. There are lucid and self explanatory.

OneDrive-2014-03-09.zip

Dear umar i chekd ur attachment.it is fairly infoyrmaftive. But there is one difficurlty that when chekig foyr story shears n selecting loads the RSA LOAD is not showing. How everr in the analysis log RSA is shown kindly elaborate the problem. Secondly elaborate the difference between RITZ EIGEN VECTORSand under wat conditions are these used. Plz also. Reference from codes be mentione

Best of regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sir a lot of thnx for ur elaborative reply to my 2nd querry. My 1st question was that when we add RSA from define menu then in static load case data what LOAD TYPE should we assign to RSA as i m using version 9. 7. 0. I hv seen video tutorials abt RSA analysis bt those tutorials are abt 15th version and inthat RSA is assigned RESPONSE SPECTRUM as load type whereas in 9. 7. 0 this load type is not included. Hope u understand my querry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Abid Qasmi said:

Sir a lot of thnx for ur elaborative reply to my 2nd querry. My 1st question was that when we add RSA from define menu then in static load case data what LOAD TYPE should we assign to RSA as i m using version 9. 7. 0. I hv seen video tutorials abt RSA analysis bt those tutorials are abt 15th version and inthat RSA is assigned RESPONSE SPECTRUM as load type whereas in 9. 7. 0 this load type is not included. Hope u understand my querry

The tutorial is for ETABS 9.7. The post is dated 2014 at which time ETABS v15 wasn't out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok but in the related tutorial specx n specy are shown in load case for scalling purpose rathr than. Inm opinion RSA will also be defi ed in static load case dropbox also and unless it is done spectral acclertion will not b displayed in tables. For defining RSA LOAD wat will be its type of load in the dropbox this is wat i want to make clear sir. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Abid Qasmi,

I would love to help you with it but the only problem is that I don't have ETABS installed, my computer is non-windows (so won't be able to do an off license installation). However, I would suggest that you try to experiment with the options and post your feedback here, and it may help resolve your issue. How about you define RSA load as earthquake. I believe that is the option in ETABS.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2014 at 11:26 PM, baz said:

You can find solved examples in the books such as Dynamics of Structures  by Anil k Chopra, and Seismic and wind design of concrete buildings by S.K. Gosh and  David Fanella.

Dear BAZ i have gone through the book but in that there isnt any example based on R.S.A w.r.t UBC 97.plz suggest a book its download link too that contains RSA based on UBC 97.

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/4/2016 at 4:33 PM, Abid Qasmi said:

Ok but in the related tutorial specx n specy are shown in load case for scalling purpose rathr than. In my opinion RSA will also be defined in static load case drop box also.And unless it is done spectral acceleration will not b displayed in tables. For defining RSA LOAD wat will be its type of load in the dropbox this is wat i want to make clear sir. 

Dear experienced fellows, i'm still unable to find the reply to the the above mentioned query that in R.S.A what is the LOAD TYPE that we assign to RSA in ETABS when we include it from DEFINE MENU for inserting  THE SPECTRAL LOAD:wacko:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 9/4/2016 at 4:33 PM, Hussain Abid said:

Ok but in the related tutorial specx n specy are shown in load case for scalling purpose rathr than. Inm opinion RSA will also be defi ed in static load case dropbox also and unless it is done spectral acclertion will not b displayed in tables. For defining RSA LOAD wat will be its type of load in the dropbox this is wat i want to make clear sir. 

@Hussain Abid   you cannot define RSA in static load cases, as RSA in dynamic loading.

Instead after you define the "response spectrum function" you should then follow it by defining "response spectrum cases".  Hope its clear enough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
On 3/27/2016 at 3:28 PM, Ahmed Waqar said:

Correct I am wrong. As per UBC # of modes shall be such that it incorporates 90% of participating mass. If participating mass is 90% in first two modes then no need of other modes. If 90% is acheiving in first 6 modes then first 6 modes are sufficient. If 90% is not acheiving then you have to scale your spectrum. In STAAD add missing mass value.

Also, I have worked on STAAD mostly. If you require STAAD model then i can attach it as well.

Good day. Assuming that 90% of the mass participation is achieved. But the Base shear from dynamic analysis is greater than the base shear from static analysis. Do I need to scale it down? Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.