Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Foundation Design For A Ware House (Steel Structure)


zaib
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have to design the foundation of a warehouse(Steel structure) on prokon. Reactions at nodes for different loads combination are available. soil bearing capacity is 180KN/m^2. Can anyone guide me how to design footing at one node. Reactions given are at base plate. I am attaching autocad drawings containing structure layout as well as reactions.PROPOSED WARE HOUSE GA DRGS 7-7-2014.dwg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Zaib it depends!

 

If you have assumed pin base then it means moment at base = 0 and you have only the vertical load reaction. If this is the case then the footing area required Areq = P/180 where P is kN and Areq is in m².

 

Then you can convert this area into a square footing or a rectangular footing as you need.

 

Or if you have moments things get more complicated so you can either do it manually or choose any software; like SAFE, PROKON or MIDAS.

 

I am not aware of PROKON, so I would tell you what to do in SAFE.

 

Start a new model and make isolated foundations (preliminary sizing) and put a node in the center of footing and put the vertical reaction on this node. Run the analysis check the bearing pressure and see if the sizing is ok. If not then change footing sizes and re-run.

 

After it design it on SAFE for reinforcements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steel structure is designed by an other consultant. i just got the reactions for footing design. From the reactions, it seems that support conditions are considered pin as Moments are zero in reactions. But there are three reactions along x,y and z directions respectively. Reaction in z direction is only due to wind load combination. I am unable to understand which reaction will be considered for footing design. If i considered the vertical component that is reaction in y-direction then what about the other reactions. Please review the reactions written on attach file and guide me. I am mentioning the reaction for one node for your consideration. at this node reactions are in x and y direction only.

Load Combination                                                       Fx(KN)            Fy(KN)             FZ(KN)

Dead                                                                           16                       45                   0

Live                                                                             31                         58                 0

Wind left(angle=0) with internal pressure                    -61                      -101                0

Wind left(angle=0) with internal suction                     -52                      -61                   0

Wind end(angle=90) with internal pressure                   -26                     -80                 0

Wind end(angle=90)with internal suction                   -17                       -40                  0

 

Base plate size is 230mm x 550 mm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the table it sounds like this

 

X= x direction

Y= vertical direction

Z = y direction

 

that makes sense for wind loads as the vertical reactions (uplift due to wind) is -101, -61, -80 and -40 (units?)

 

and at the same time wind loads in horizontal x direction are: -61, -52, 26 and -17

 

but what doesnt make sense is why there are no reactions in y direction which is Z in your case??? there is no wind loading applied in that direction?

 

----------------

The next step is to combine these loads according to chapter 9 load combinations of ACI

 

remember here we will make both service combinations for bearing pressure check and ultimate combinations for reinforcement design of footings

 

then combine all these loads and check bearing pressure and reinforcement design by hand or by any software

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the reaction sheet provided to me Fx and Fz both are written as Horizontal and Fy as vertical

Reactions are in KN

The reactions i have mentioned are at a node of a frame whose vertical members are not braced with inclined members.

There are frames whose members are  braced with inclined members, reactions at the nodes of these frames have Fz components of magnitude 6-12KN. The values of Fz are only for the Wind load left(angle=0) with internal pressure.

 

I have the load combinations but before proceeding for design i must understands about these reactions so that i can put them rightly in the software.

For design of footing by prokon, i have to put the reaction in the following

 

P

Hx

Hy

Mx

My

 

I am confused about either vertical reaction Fy will be placed at the place of P or Hy?

Where i have to put the value of Fz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should check sign convention used in Prokon!

 

and sign convention of your system

 

-------

From the above discussion it looks like that in prokon

 

P = Fy (check + or - sign convention in Prokon)

 

Hx = Fx

 

Hy = Fz

 

Mx = 0

 

My = 0

 

Mz = 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am unable to check sign conventions used in Prokon. However i have designed the footing by taking Fy=P and Fx=Hx,

I have used 13 load cases for design of footing.

Reactions and load cases are as under

Load combinations Reactions Moments

Fx(Hz) Vt(Fy) Hz(Fz) Mx My Mz

KN KN KN KN-m KN-m KN-m

Dead Load 15.465 45.012 0 0 0 0

Live Load 30.93 57.864 0 0 0 0

Wind left (angle=0) with internal pressure -61.315 -100.846 0 0 0 0

Wind left (angle=0) with internal suction -51.87 -61.126 0 0 0 0

Wind end (angle=90) with internal pressure -25.917 -79.44 0 0 0 0

Wind end (angle=90) with internal suction -16.471 -39.72 0 0 0 0

Load cases P Hx

D 45 15

L 58 31

1 D+L 103 46

2 1.2D+L+1.6W1 -49 -49

3 1.2D+L+1.6W2 14 -34

4 1.2D+L+1.6W3 -15 8

5 1.2D+L+1.6W4 48 -14

6 1.2D+1.6L+0.8W1 66 19

7 1.2D+1.6L+0.8W2 98 27

8 1.2D+1.6L+0.8W3 83 47

9 1.2D+1.6L+0.8W4 115 55

10 0.9D+1.6W1 -121 -84

11 0.9D+1.6W2 -57 -69

12 0.9D+1.6W3 -87 -28

13 0.9D+1.6W4 -23 -12

Load case 10 seems to be most critical

I am attaching the design of footing considering the above mentioned data. Please review and advice

Design of footing at node-1.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you must use service combinations for bearing pressure of foundations!

 

13 load combinations you mentioned are ultimate combinations for design of reinforcement!

 

You should really check with seniors as these are basic things which you must learn asap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first combination is D+L. Is it not the service load Combination?

My senior most of the time remains on site. He just asked me to design footing on Prokon and get help from net.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is very weird way of seniors to teach their juniors. Well D+L is a service combo but not the only combinations. There a lot of other combinations like 1.0D+0.6W etc. Goto ASCE 2005 pdf page 34, chapter 2 for example.

 

You must first read basics before using prokon and other softwares; for example read Nilson's 14th edition book on Reinforced Concrete Design. Chapter 17 i think on foundations.

 

 

I am very upset to say that if that is the behaviour of your seniors in office, tomorrow they gonna say

 

"well you have done so much your self so you are now an expert. Come on, take this building and design everything because you did it before. Right?"

 

Talk to your seniors boss and dont worry, otherwise QUIT THIS JOB! A sincere but strange suggestion from my side!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok i will study the referred Chapters.

I have already discuss the matter with boss. He said that you will learn by consulting books and internet help. He said no one have time to teach the Juniors, you have to learn yourself and little bit guidance of seniors.

I have not designed this building(steel structure). Have to design foundation.

I will left this job when in will get any good opportunity. Your suggestion not seems strange to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.