Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Minimum Steel Ratio In Mat


mhdhamood
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dears;
The minimum steel ratio =0.0018 is for one face or for the 2 faces of the section (top & bottom)??
As far as I know that 0.0018 is for the face exposed to tension (not the 2 faces). Since the Mat suffers tension at top and bottom of the section at the same section so we provide 0.0018 for 2 faces .
Am I right???
Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minimum reinforcement in a mat footing, is to be provided as per Section 7.12.2 of ACI 318-08, as specified in ACI Section 15.10.4.

 

The amount of reinforcement to be provided (e.g., 0.0018 b h for Grade 60 reinforcing steel), is for each face (top or bottom).  This is because of the fact the mat reinforcement is provided to resist tensile stresses (rather than temperature or shrinkage) on the relevant (top or bottom) face of the mat, similar to minimum reinforcement provided in RC beams.

 

Regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Uzair,

You mean in slabs or isolated or combined footings, this 0.0018bh is for GROSS AREA i.e. 0.009bh per face because they need minimum reinforcement for temperature control but mat and beams are exception?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Waqas,

 

No. It is not so.

 

This As,min = .0018bh is actually minimum flexural (tensile) reinforcement for each face of mat (NOT the temperature reinforcement), although its amount is is same for the both.  In case of flexure, you have to provide the full amount (=0.0018bh) at each of the relevant location/face.

 

For example, if the uniform thickness of mat is 15 inches and you are using Grade 60 rebars,

 

                       As, min = 0.0018x12x15 = 0.324 sq. in./ft width of mat per face of mat.

 

This amount of reinforcement (0.324 sq. in./ft) has to provided in full at top face of mat at mid-span, and same amount has also to be provided at bottom face of mat near the supports / edges of the mat. This is however, subject to the condition that required flexural reinforcement at these locations is less than 'As,min', otherwise you will have to provide the reinforcement amount required by flexural calculations.

 

Regards.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are talking about mats/rafts. I am talking about footing slab and floor slab. But I m very much confused now. Let me put my confusions here.

 

Quote

 

According to ACI 7.12.2.1, it says

 

Deformed reinforcement conforming to 3.5.3

used for shrinkage and temperature reinforcement

shall be provided in accordance with the following:

 

7.12.2.1 — Area of shrinkage and temperature

reinforcement shall provide at least the following ratios

of reinforcement area to gross concrete area, but not

less than 0.0014:

 

(a) Slabs where Grade 40 or 50

deformed bars are used .................................0.0020

 

(b )  Slabs where Grade 60

deformed bars or welded wire

reinforcement are used...................................0.0018

 

© Slabs where reinforcement

with yield stress exceeding 60,000 psi

measured at a yield strain of

0.35 percent is used ......................0.0018 × 60,000/fy

 

Now here it is saying provide this minimum temperature reinforcement to the Gross area.

 

and According to it commentary, it says

 

R7.12.2 — The amounts specified for deformed bars and

welded wire reinforcement are empirical but have been used

satisfactorily for many years. The area of reinforcement

given by 7.12.2.1 may be distributed near the top or bottom

of the slab, or may be allocated between the two faces of the

slab as deemed appropriate for specific conditions. Splices

and end anchorages of shrinkage and temperature reinforcement

are to be designed for the full specified yield strength

in accordance with 12.1, 12.15, 12.18, and 12.19.

 

Here it also says this 0.002bh or 0.0018bh is for gross area or either we can distribute between two faces or we can provide at center. 

 

But According to 7.12.1.2, it says

 

7.12.1.2 — Where shrinkage and temperature

movements are significantly restrained, the requirements

of 8.2.4 and 9.2.3 shall be considered.

 

And in its commentary it says

 

R7.12.1.2 — The area of shrinkage and temperature

reinforcement required by 7.12.2.1 has been satisfactory where

shrinkage and temperature movements are permitted to

occur. Where structural walls or columns provide significant

restraint to shrinkage and temperature movements, the

restrain of volume changes causes tension in slabs, as well as

displacements, shear forces, and flexural moments in columns

or walls. In these cases, it may be necessary to increase the

amount of slab reinforcement required by 7.12.2.1 due to the

shrinkage and thermal effects in both principal directions (see

References 7.7 and 7.16).


 

 
 
I m confused when our slabs offer this movement and when does not. Because in slabs we cast slabs monolithically with beams and slabs will be offered restraints at ends of slab. 
 
Till now what i have been doing is i provide half of minimum reinforcement at top and half of reinforcement at bottom in footing slabs but if i m providing only one layer of steel I provide full 0.002bh or 0.0018bh steel. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Waqas,

 

Don't be confused. It is very simple.

 

All you have referred to in your post, is about and applicable to minimum area of reinforcement, required to resist 'shrinkage and temperature movements' in slabs and mats.

 

On the other hand, I have discussed the distribution of minimum reinforcement, required to resist 'shrinkage and temperature movements' only, reinforcement distribution shall be as mentioned in ACI section 7.12.2 (referred by you).

 

However, when the slab or mat has to resist 'primarily, distribution of reinforcement shall be as per flexural requirements. In this case, total amount of 'As,min' has to be provided at each face of slab or mat subjected to '

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks brother. Previous confusion is clear. What i m confused now is how to decide when i m to provide temp/shrinkage reinforcement and when to provide for flexural minimum. Our slabs/ mats always going to experience flexural stresses because no strata is ever hard enough. Slab/mat will bend in any case. So what would be the case when  temp/shrinkage reinforcement only and when to provide for flexural minimum? 

Also if u can refer me some study material regarding flexural minimum reinforcement I will be very thankful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.