Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Torsion in Buildings


Kasim
 Share

Recommended Posts

i have attached the photo of Modal mass participation Ratio of the Model, is The first mode is Torsional? As the RZ is 0.19 of the mass, and Can we allow Torsion in first mode? 

and is the First or the 2nd mode is the Fundamental one?

Capture.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Yes we can allow torsion or anything in a building as long as you are designing for that (uneconomical).

2. Fundamental mode? What is a fundamental mode? A mode with highest mass participation.

3. Why you are just looking at Rz in first mode?

From the table you attached, in my opinion;

First mode = Mode2 of ETABS with 54.56% mass participation in X direction. (T=0.553s)

Second mode = Mode3 of ETABS with 36.33% mp, rotation in Z direction (T=0.505s)

Third mode = Mode1 of ETABS with 34.75% mp in Y direction (T=0.586s)

Remember that ETABS lists mode based on descending order of T and not mass participation but in my opinion we should sort modes based on mp. Moreover, You have to check that modes are not "CLOSELY SPACED". That means, if you look at T above, you will find that translational modes (T=0.553 & 0.505s) are very close to torsional mode (T=0.586s). This is bad. Try changing configuration of your building. You can still continue designing like that but ofcourse its more economical (bad design).

 

From the data you provided, it looks like your building is undergoing translational+rotational in a complex way all at once. The shape, geometry, configuration of shear walls etc is not regular or you are trying to model a very stiff and very flexible elements together like a concrete basement supporting a light steel roof/canopy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Waseem Sir, This is A four Storey Building having Basement Shear walls and Having Two Elevators Which  are not Symetric about X Axis, Will make it symetric and then will hear from you, :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

This topic is very informative. Thanks for the replies. But I think I am lagging interpreting the table. I have the following table and cant interpret. Can anybody help what does the table say and how does it effect the design?

Case Mode Period
sec
UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ
Modal 1 0.719 0.3 0.1009 0 0.3 0.1009 0 0.0699 0.2062 0.2 0.0699 0.2062 0.2
Modal 2 0.702 0.0932 0.5007 0 0.3932 0.6015 0 0.3481 0.064 0.0103 0.418 0.2702 0.2102
Modal 3 0.642 0.2212 0.0081 0 0.6144 0.6096 0 0.0056 0.1487 0.3996 0.4237 0.4189 0.6099
Modal 4 0.217 0.0267 0.0377 0 0.6411 0.6473 0 0.0578 0.0441 0.0252 0.4814 0.463 0.6351
Modal 5 0.212 0.036 0.0492 0 0.6771 0.6965 0 0.0752 0.0581 0.0039 0.5566 0.5211 0.639
Modal 6 0.196 0.029 0.0037 0 0.7061 0.7002 0 0.0057 0.0445 0.0628 0.5623 0.5655 0.7018
Modal 7 0.119 0.0042 0.0131 0 0.7103 0.7133 0 0.007 0.0025 0.0103 0.5693 0.5681 0.7121
Modal 8 0.114 0.0163 0.0097 0 0.7267 0.723 0 0.0055 0.0096 0.0007 0.5747 0.5777 0.7128
Modal 9 0.108 0.0074 0.0037 0 0.734 0.7267 0 0.0022 0.0043 0.0177 0.577 0.5819 0.7305
Modal 10 0.092 1.318E-05 0.0046 0 0.734 0.7313 0 0.0072 2.301E-05 0.0021 0.5842 0.582 0.7326
Modal 11 0.038 0.2543 0.0002 0 0.9883 0.7315 0 0.0004 0.3844 0.0005 0.5846 0.9663 0.7331
Modal 12 0.037 0.0021 0.0009 0 0.9904 0.7324 0 0.0025 0.0032 1.603E-06 0.5871 0.9695 0.7331
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Increase modes from 12 to have SumRx more than 90%.

2.

first mode is translation in x plus some torsion.

second mode is pure translation y.

third mode is torsional + x-translation.

 

it appears that you have irregularities in x direction (CM and CR are at different locations).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hello, I am doing modal analysis of an irregular building (mass irregularity and torsion). I am facing difficulties interpreting the table and what modes should be considered to reached 90% MPMR. I have the following table and i can't interpret. Can anybody helps me to obtain the appropriate mode shapes?  

Thnak you,

Untitled.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ayman,

You will need to see the mass participation per mode and then make sure you have enough modes (sum up the mass participation for each mode) to meet your building code requirement (90% or something varies from Code to Code).  If you didn't have enough modes when you sum up the modal mass participation per mode, then you need to increase the number of modes thill you sum hits the magical number as specified in the code. The table above is showing displacements per mode is different than what you should be looking at.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I'm having a hard time understanding this table. My supervisor said the sum of Ux Uy Uz Rx Ry Rz for the first three mode should be 100% but now it is not. Also for the first three mode there should be at least one cell from Rx Ry Rz to be a relatively large number respectively. Could anyone help me with that please!image.thumb.png.21e0950534c48ada4794d21798ae65fa.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.