Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Creating Default.edb File


Recommended Posts

Creating ETABS Default.edb file

Creating Default.edb file for ETABS

When you start ETABS and click on New Model…, it asks

to choose edb file, either default or custom. In this tutorial you will be able

to create a default.edb file. The advantage for this option is, you can immediately start working on building the model

instead of first defining the material and section properties. The choose.edb

option is for selecting an ETABS file which is not default but you want to use

parameters of the model used in other project.

So, in this tutorial you are going to make a default edb

file containing all the information, units and options in which you want to

work and don’t want to waste your time every time you start a new model.

We will work in SI units in this

tutorial.

1-Start ETABS

3-Select kN-m from lower right

corner units drop box.

4-Start a new

model and when asked for edb file, Choose No, because at this time you are

creating your first edb default file.

5-Select “Grid Only”

option and press ok.

No we will work menu by menu. So first

one is file menu.

FILE menu

i-Print Setup

Select your default printer and paper size.

DEFINE menu

Select your units to be N-mm

i-Material Properties

Select add new materials and define different concrete

strengths you use commonly. For example

Conc. 21: 21N/mm² compressive strength and 420N/mm²

steel strength with 4700√f’c as modulus of Elasticity.

Conc. 25, Conc. 30, Conc. 35, Conc. 40

etc.

ii-Frame Sections

Select the first section in the list then scroll to the

bottom and while holding the Ctrl button select the last section in the list,

then click on delete button. All frame sections except the last one will not be

deleted. You can add new sections and once you have defined your section, you

will be able to delete also this last undesired section.

Add all the sections, you want to

be in your project, for example rectangular, circular etc. Define as many

sections as you can. Sometimes, you want to optimize your sections and want to

increase say a beam’s depth by 50mm and check if it is passing or not. So

first define the smallest section and then define all other sections with depth

increment of 50mm (or 3 inches) keeping the width same. Once you have reached

the limit for the depth of the members, say 1000mm then start defining the

sections with width increment. This step is most time consuming, but as you do

it, I bet it will be much time saving for your next models. If a beam say

250x300 is failing, you will not need to define another section say 250x400,

rather you will just select it from the pre-defined sections and change the

section to see if its passing or not and so on. You MUST concentrate hard on

this step and on cover values and material of sections, because once you define

the sections, it will be hard to catch the error in

cover or depth or width values. For an example you can have your sections like

this:-

B-250x300 B-300x300 C-300x300

B-250x350 B-300x350 C-400X400

B-250x400 B-300x400 C-500X500

Note:

Cover to rebar center is distance b/w edge of beam to

centroid of reinforcement. I recommend you to use two layers of the main bars

you use commonly for top and bottom reinforcement and #3 bars or (T10) bars for

stirrups and 40mm cover. Remember when you use two layers, the distance b/w

bars (vertically) should be larger of 25mm(1”)

or main bar dia. For example for moderate height and size of

buildings. You can 2 layers T-16 main T-10 stirrups so cover = depth –

40cover – 10stirrups – 16 (1layer of T016)-(25/2mm) for half of

dist b/w bars. = depth – 80.

iii-Wall/Slab/Deck Sections

Define all your slab sections here. For example 2way150 (two

way slab 150thick) 1way125(one way slab 125 thick)

etc. Please select material for each section carefully. Membrane and bending

thickness is same mostly. But if you have pre-cast slab with 75mm topping, your

bending thickness will be 75mm and your membrane thickness will total thickness

(slab+topping). If you have flat slab, select shell option, otherwise membrane

option. For one way slab use special one way slab

distribution option.

SHELL: Transfers load to horizontal boundary elements (beams

in two way slab with beams).

MEMBRANE: Transfers load to boundary nodes (columns in flat

slab).

Slab load is distributed by 45 degree tributary area method.

iv-Static Load Cases

Define all your static load cases. To be simple, define

Dead, Live, EQ and wind loads.

Put dead load multiplier 1 in one of any dead load case. No

need to put separate Self wt load case. Usually dead load cases are DL, WALLS,Finishes. For simplicity and for small projects, you can use

only 1 case as DL (including all finishes, walls, self wt) etc and one LL.

For earthquake loads, you must define four cases

EQX1- X direction + Y Eccent.

EQX2- X direction – Y Eccent.

EQY1-Y direction + X Eccent.

EQY2-Y direction – X Eccent.

Eccentricity ratio should be 0.05(5%). These four directions

are necessary for irregular buildings. If you have perfectly regular and

symmetric building, you can use only one X and one Y direction.

v-Special Seismic Load Data

Select do not use special seismic load data and press ok.

vi-Mass Source

Select “From loads” option because we will not

generally put additional masses inside our model and self weight is also being

calculated with DL (self wt. multiplier is 1). So everything will calculated based on your given loads. Use 100%DL(all dead load not just self wt.) + 25%LL (see UBC-97

code). For light buildings you can use 100%DL + 15%LL.

ANALYZE menu

i-Set analysis options

Unselect dynamic and P-Delta option, if you do not want to

use these options. (UBC Equivalent Static Process, used in moderate size

buildings.) If you run your model with dynamic option selected, you will not be

able to see static seismic calculations in summary file, even if you remove

dynamic option and run the model again. This is a bug in ETABS. So if you are

sure that you will use STATIC process, remember to check dynamic option is unselected

before running your model.

OPTIONS menu

i-Preferences>Concrete Frame Design

Select your code. For ACI, ACI-02 is best. Select seismic

design category. If you want to convert UBC Seismic zone to seismic category,

refer to ACI table R1.1.9.1 in Chapter 1. Do not change pattern load factor.

Utilization factor limit is the additional ETABS factor of safety. It’s

not recommended to change this factor also.

ii-Preferences>Reinforcement Bar Sizes

Change to your needs and delete unnecessary bar data.

iii-Preferences>Live Load Reduction

Select your parameters. Usually no live load reduction is

selected.

And that’s it. You are done. You have successfully

configured everything you needed for your next models. Now it’s the time

to save it in proper location.

Click Save As… in file menu and select the

installation folder of ETABS, if there is already default.edb file, overwrite it, otherwise save as “Default.edb”.

Now every time you start a new model and when asked to

choose edb, just select the Default.edb button and you will find all the

settings there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.