Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Improve Bearing Capacity of Soil


Muhammad Ameen Ali
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

There are many factors that need to be considered here, to answer the post properly:

1. Type of soil - cohesive or non-cohesive? Techniques are different for both.

2. There are many techniques for improving soil bearing capacity. What techniques are readily available in the local market?

3. Water table level - impacts bearing capacity is sandy soils;

4. Is ground settlement your concern?

5. Working in metric units:  kN & m;     0.75 tsf (80kN/sqm) to 1.8tsf (190kN/sqm): You must consider the "overburden removed". Two basements means (say 7-8m dig), therefore overburden (soil) removed would be 18kN/cum times say 7m = 126kn/sqm (1.3 ton per sq ft pressure removed). i.e. bearing pressure at the depth would be Pb+1.3tsf ...close to what you want. .... the key being water table or finding a low strength soil like "peat", in such or similar low strength ground cases  ground improvement or piling solution would be needed - don’t undervalue the expertise of a geotechnical engineering specialist - consult them always!

6. Immediately after the dig protect the formation level surface by blinding with 75mm lean mix concrete or say 100mm of small stone gravel sub-base;

7. Raft footings - depending on thickness and stiffness, tend to then spread load over a large area, and would limit settlement etc. Not sure why a raft is needed in this case, as technically you have a 6-storey building - unless ground is very poor?

8. You have six/seven storey building - say superimposing a total load of 75kNsqm - 0.8ton per sq ft -  (load obviously concentrated on column locations)!

Hope this helps?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2019 at 8:46 AM, UmarMakhzumi said:

You are better off using a different foundation system if your bearing capacity is super low than expected. Have you considered piling? You can use friction piles if loads are low.

Thanks.

Piling is impossible due to site conditions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Simple Structures said:

There are many factors that need to be considered here, to answer the post properly:

1. Type of soil - cohesive or non-cohesive? Techniques are different for both.

2. There are many techniques for improving soil bearing capacity. What techniques are readily available in the local market?

3. Water table level - impacts bearing capacity is sandy soils;

4. Is ground settlement your concern?

5. Working in metric units:  kN & m;     0.75 tsf (80kN/sqm) to 1.8tsf (190kN/sqm): You must consider the "overburden removed". Two basements means (say 7-8m dig), therefore overburden (soil) removed would be 18kN/cum times say 7m = 126kn/sqm (1.3 ton per sq ft pressure removed). i.e. bearing pressure at the depth would be Pb+1.3tsf ...close to what you want. .... the key being water table or finding a low strength soil like "peat", in such or similar low strength ground cases  ground improvement or piling solution would be needed - don’t undervalue the expertise of a geotechnical engineering specialist - consult them always!

6. Immediately after the dig protect the formation level surface by blinding with 75mm lean mix concrete or say 100mm of small stone gravel sub-base;

7. Raft footings - depending on thickness and stiffness, tend to then spread load over a large area, and would limit settlement etc. Not sure why a raft is needed in this case, as technically you have a 6-storey building - unless ground is very poor?

8. You have six/seven storey building - say superimposing a total load of 75kNsqm - 0.8ton per sq ft -  (load obviously concentrated on column locations)!

Hope this helps?

 

Thankyou Sir for your suggestion

i answers below your all points according to site condition. 

1. partly cohesive soil.

2. At site Soil compaction possible.

3. water table depth about 500feet. 

4.Yes

5. Already 30feet excavation was done long time ago, there is no secant piles for the retaintion of letarel soil pressure, if i go for piling .

and at that 30feet bearing capacity is 0.75tsf.

7. Yes this building is supported by Raft footing, there is no other option.

8. how you can total load on column is 0.8tsf

Sir i am searching for the solution that how to compact the soil to increase the bearing pressure upto atleast 1.5tsf and what is the methodology of compaction.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Engineers need to be specific on soils - 'partly cohesive' can mean many things. Is there a site investigation report ? i.e have boreholes been undertaken to identify soil types etc below the excavated surface? One should always have a geotechnical / soils report for the site before undertaking any ground-works, such as compaction. Get a soils site investigation done first! Depth of boreholes ( i would suggest 5, 4 near corners and one in middle) below raft should be at least equal to width of raft;

In this case as the overburden has been removed for sometime, the soil may have heaved (up) and this will settle as building load is applied! See option below with layer of 400mm small stone replacement;

2. After SI compaction options: 1, Dynamic compaction from height (could cause vibration to adjacent structures!); 2. Impact compaction special compaction adaption fixed to excavator; 3. rollers etc; 4.  I would removed 400mm of top soil and put in stone compacted by roller, placed in 100mm layers; This will provide a good hard surface locally.

3. OK, water table is low...good... don't forget it will rain and if soil has too much clay you will get a perched water table around the basement!

4. Very difficult to judge if all future settlement will be taken out by compaction technique; use of raft footings will help limit this or the settlement will be uniform;

5. Basement walls will resist any lateral pressure - secant wall is only need for an excavation where site is tight and excavation slopes are not possible?

6. -

7. Raft ok

8....blank load on raft .... at column 0.8tsf (say 75kN/sqm) ... if columns are at say 6m centres then typical INTERNAL column load would be: 75x7x7 = 3675kN (or 0.8 x 21 x 21 = 350t) - for example!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.