Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.


Aye Min Khaing
 Share

Recommended Posts

Practically, the behaviour of a bolted connection resembles to a "pinned" connection more than a welded connection for a connection designed as "pinned". Because welded connection are more rigid than a bolted connection. However in reality,  a bolted or even a welded connection designed as a pinned connection, provides some degree of resistance to the moment. Very few connections in reality are truly pinned or truly fixed. And, while a hinge connection could be considered a “worst case scenario” for the beam itself, it does not hold true for the connection, and the supporting member. Because, a "wannabe" hinge connection will in fact transfer "some" moment and it's possible that the connection, or other elements that the connection is attached to may be too weak to resist that moment.

Now coming to your question, a gusset plate is a mean to connect a member to a supporting member. A member can be fastened to Gusset plate using either bolts or weld. 
Direct welding can also be done, and is definitely a more cost effective option but, it could results in field fit-up problems. As to the degree of resistance to moment, If i were you, I would ask following questions to myself.
1. Do I need to be concerned with the possibility of end moments?
Depends on how large an end moment I'll get.
To check this, I'll perform the analysis for full joint stiffness (i.e., no end releases) and see how "big" the end moment I'm getting. If very small, I might neglect these end moments after cursory making sure it'll not cause any unwanted yeilding in my connection/supporting member. For large magnitude, I'll either provide a fixed connection or will properly model the provided joint stiffnesses. 

2. How rigid is the provided connection?
Depends on the thickness/size of connection plate and spacing of bolts or weld length/distances.
For exact estimation, I believe there's a method specified in euro code with detailed guide lines. (And before you ask, I don't remember the reference off my head, you'll have to surf the net for this one)


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s consider a steel beam to steel column connection – to respond to your query:

1. The connection first needs to be designed for the Shear Force on beam end - this vertical force will dictate - number of bolts or length of weld.

2. I have designed a pin connection, with two members, being connected by a 75mm (3inch) diameter pin/bolt – a large single bolt and a gusset connection gave me the pin behaviour, and full rotation at the connection. Full rotation at the connections means you will get close to a "pure pin" as you can get. Such connections are often used for "special" architectural features structures.

3. For a beam connected to a column say, a 2-bolt connection would be considered as 'pin' connection; Even a 4-bolt connection would be considered a pin; The higher the shear, the higher the number of bolts. Still pin connection!

4. For a moment or fixed connection, the end plate on the beam will be thicker, will have welded stiffeners, on both end plate/beam, and on column web too! The forces are much higher, and rotation of join is restricted. If you have a building where no shear walls or X-bracing was allowed anywhere then you would design all beam/column connections as fixed "moment connections" - sized to suit the moment you obtained from your structural analysis. The moment connections provide the lateral sway resistance also in this case.

5. Welding in a quality-controlled workshop is good - welding on site, often overhead welding situation, requires special procedures and specially trained welders! In most developed countries there are special procedures for site welding followed by onsite weld testing - site welding is therefore avoided where possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6. Ooops… the question related to a truss connection... just to add, same applies to a truss end connection, where top chord and bottom chords are fixed to a column, the depth of truss (lever arm) the moment connection, and resistance to sway. 

7 ...the internal connections, nodes in a truss are workshop welded, are pinned. …unless the truss is too big for transporting on a lorry, and then a bolted "splice connection" is provided to suit transport length to get the full truss length. These splice connections are bolted on the ground at the site location, and then the truss is lifted by crane into place (members also designed/checked for this temporary crane lifting forces!).

8. Finally remember, in a truss the loads in members in purely axial (compression or tension).

9. In a Vierendeel girder, where there are no diagonal members, then the vertical member and top and bottom chord connections are moment connection. But the site "splice" connection on the Vierendeel girder is also bolted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Full and Partial moment resistant connections in steel frame:

First thing to note is that steel frame design is all about understanding and mastering joint behaviour and joint design!..... whilst selection of beam or column size is easy.... it’s the joints that determine how the frame will behave under vertical and later loading. 

Steel column to beam joints are characterised by "stiffness" (rigid joint, semi rigid or pinned) and "strength" (full, partial or pinned).

For moment resisting frames the joints are MOSTLY "continuous or full moment resisting". As "semi-continuous or partial moment resisting" joints are discouraged as it relies on rotational stiffness of the joint. This is not easy to do, and thus most codes do not recommend it.

I have previously in another post said that one connection that I may design for "partial fixity" is the column to foundation connection - only for lateral sway purposes. Please read that post. In such cases the column is provided with minimum of four bolts spread apart, to assist during erection of the column as first item of frame. With four bolts it will stand up under temporary case (as a cantilever till beams are fixed to it), and often the most onerous loading case.

Here are pictorial examples of "full moment resistance connections in steel frames".... detail design of connection is an art. The connections require thick end plates, bolts with large lever arm, and cap and backing plates etc. 

Hope this helps the understanding the "moment resisting steel frame joint".

By the way, I started my career as a structural steel welder, reinforcement steel fixer, then a draughtsman, then Engineer .... thus I have welded and erected many steel frames in my early years!  The reason for mentioning this is that Structural Engineers, who have become engineers through gaining degrees and have missed out on practical skills, should make a habit of regularly visiting construction sites regularly, look at the details, talk to the trades men (or women) on site, and gain valuable experience from their see and hear….

image.png.aa6ebc53d1a1c068eb415152737edb7f.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

can I say that you can assign any type of connection (welded or bolted) to any joints? then it would be up to the engineer to design this connection if it could take shear, tension, and moment? for example, you can implement a welded connection to act as a pin if it can take the forces but not the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The answer to your question is broadly YES.  Normally the consulting engineer does frame analysis and provides joint / node forces to the steelwork fabricator (a specialist) who will have his own design office / connection specializing design engineer just designing connections. He will design the connection to suit (i) their workshop way of working, (ii) & how they will assemble (erect) the steel frame on site.

In the western countries bolted connections are preferred on site, unless there is a special (architectural or other specific) reason for welding. 

Each country has its preference - where you are it may be different to the way its done where I am based.

Here are few points to remember:

1.You assign the forces for the connection - shear, tension and moment as you get them from your frame analysis - and put them in a table on on the drawing for each frame (grid line) or each joint / node. On the drawing is best, give your +/ve -/ve notation. You state if the forces are factored (ultimate) or un-factored (working) loads.

2. Endplates to beams are always welded (most cases) in the workshop, and the beam and column connections are generally bolted on site location.

3. Welding on site in most countries is avoided as it requires good quality control system to be in place on site and also requires an experienced specially trained "coded welder" to undertake the work on site. 

4. Avoid site welding at all cost - unless its the norm in your country. Bolted connections can also be designed as moment connection, and are used 95% of the time on site!

5. Give loads for each worst case, i.e Max& Min Dead, Live (Superimposed), Wind and Earthquake loading clearly stating whether loads are factored and un-factored and +ve -ve notation for avoidance of doubt. Connection designer will then combine them into the most onerous combination.

6. Lastly welded connection can be pinned also- diagonal wind brace welded connection has tension and shear forces - no moment. In a steel truss connections can be welded (or bolted) and there is pure tension or compression! Yes "connection design engineer" will know what to do .... you just give him the connection/node forces in tabulated form.

Hope this helps.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.