Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

RCC Flat Slab Over Steel Columns


M.Arslan Umar
 Share

Recommended Posts

AoA

Dear members, I have a few questions regarding the topic mentioned above. 

Is there possibility of resting an RCC flat slab over steel columns? Is there any research paper/article regarding that? What and how will the connection be made?  What will be the connection response against sesimic activity? 

Thanks and regards 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are in Pakistan then i would be tempted to use "Precast Concrete Columns" rather than Steel Columns due to limited availability of heavy sections; Steel Sections are used for speed on construction.

Nevertheless: I have designed a steel column / concrete flat slab (plate) configuration previously. This is your best course of action:

1. Decide which "design code" you will use for the design, and follow its procedure for slab shear check; This is key;

2. The steel columns will require short cantilever sections coming out into slab;

3. Make sure you can feed reinforcement through the steel section or above and below it and get adequate concrete cover;

4. Check slab shear - you will require lines of shear (vertical) reinforcement within slab, successive perimeters, around the column;

Slab shear check around column is key! 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2020 at 2:11 AM, M.Arslan Umar said:

AoA

Dear members, I have a few questions regarding the topic mentioned above. 

Is there possibility of resting an RCC flat slab over steel columns? Is there any research paper/article regarding that? What and how will the connection be made?  What will be the connection response against sesimic activity? 

Thanks and regards 

The situation here is very similar to where foundations are placed on steel piles (although there is no continuity for piles to top like columns can have another column on top of slab). I can explain to you what is done for the pile connection. Normally a cap plate is used on top of the pile and dowels are welded to the cap plate that get embedded in the foundation concrete. The dowels can be designed for shear and tension forces (Moment is resolved into tension). I haven't done a configuration in slab but for piles, I have done a lot of these.

Regards,

Makhzumi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/1/2020 at 4:01 AM, UmarMakhzumi said:

The situation here is very similar to where foundations are placed on steel piles (although there is no continuity for piles to top like columns can have another column on top of slab). I can explain to you what is done for the pile connection. Normally a cap plate is used on top of the pile and dowels are welded to the cap plate that get embedded in the foundation concrete. The dowels can be designed for shear and tension forces (Moment is resolved into tension). I haven't done a configuration in slab but for piles, I have done a lot of these.

Regards,

Makhzumi.

AoA,

Sir can you please share the connection details of Steel pile and cap plate?

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/26/2020 at 4:41 PM, Simple Structures said:

If you are in Pakistan then i would be tempted to use "Precast Concrete Columns" rather than Steel Columns due to limited availability of heavy sections; Steel Sections are used for speed on construction.

Nevertheless: I have designed a steel column / concrete flat slab (plate) configuration previously. This is your best course of action:

1. Decide which "design code" you will use for the design, and follow its procedure for slab shear check; This is key;

2. The steel columns will require short cantilever sections coming out into slab;

3. Make sure you can feed reinforcement through the steel section or above and below it and get adequate concrete cover;

4. Check slab shear - you will require lines of shear (vertical) reinforcement within slab, successive perimeters, around the column;

Slab shear check around column is key! 

 

 

AoA

Can the steel plate (connected to column) replace the cantilever sections. If not, then which type of sections would be more suitable?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The situation here is very similar to where foundations are placed on steel piles (although there is no continuity for piles to top like columns can have another column on top of slab). I can explain to you what is done for the pile connection. Normally a cap plate is used on top of the pile and dowels are welded to the cap plate that get embedded in the foundation concrete. The dowels can be designed for shear and tension forces (Moment is resolved into tension). I haven't done a configuration in slab but for piles, I have done a lot of these.

Regards,

Makhzumi.

i've just read this topic and i started to search through google.
i found this paper .
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/6/11/317/htm

this is interesting.
So, in your project, what is your consideration for choosing this typical of pile (steel piles).
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@M.Arslan Umar

I attach two sketches which I did over my tea break:

1. Shows the steel column supporting a flat slab (flat plate) with no down stand beams.

2. Shows steel column with welded steel cantilever 750mm long beams cast within slab depth - no down stand beams.

You can also carry the column above to the next slab level up.

 Structural Engineer - key design decisions

1. What design code am I designing to? ACI or Eurocode - follow their procedure for flat plate / flat slab design.

2. Make sue slab is deep enough to house steel sections.

3. The key thing with flat slab design to make sure there is shear links/stirrups in slab around the column - again follow code procedure!

Sadly, Pakistan does not have code; Many practicing Engineers follow American codes - different versions ACI 318-19; ACI 318-11 etc. I prefer to use the Eurocodes - easier to follow for practical design! Sadly, in Pakistan we are obsessed with US stuff - status thing I think.

Sorry about poor quality of sketches... done on the kitc1156221215_Steelcolumnsupportingslabwithweldedcantilver750mmlongbeams.thumb.jpg.dd3c52ff5b7bcdc12843d401e4d1b467.jpghen table on paper hand towels!

 

 

 

 

Steel column supporting falt slab with welded rebar and couplers.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SimpleStructurs,

Good sketches. I will just add:

1) For Option 1, adding Nelson studs for embedded steel members would beneficial.

2) For Option 2, the dowels are generally aligned with column circumference for circular columns or on flanges for W columns so that the moment due to tension can directly transfer to column else plate needs to be designed for that force and based on the arrangement of dowels the column to beam connection can behave as pin.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/13/2020 at 12:21 AM, Simple Structures said:

@M.Arslan Umar

I attach two sketches which I did over my tea break:

1. Shows the steel column supporting a flat slab (flat plate) with no down stand beams.

2. Shows steel column with welded steel cantilever 750mm long beams cast within slab depth - no down stand beams.

You can also carry the column above to the next slab level up.

 Structural Engineer - key design decisions

1. What design code am I designing to? ACI or Eurocode - follow their procedure for flat plate / flat slab design.

2. Make sue slab is deep enough to house steel sections.

3. The key thing with flat slab design to make sure there is shear links/stirrups in slab around the column - again follow code procedure!

Sadly, Pakistan does not have code; Many practicing Engineers follow American codes - different versions ACI 318-19; ACI 318-11 etc. I prefer to use the Eurocodes - easier to follow for practical design! Sadly, in Pakistan we are obsessed with US stuff - status thing I think.

Sorry about poor quality of sketches... done on the kitc1156221215_Steelcolumnsupportingslabwithweldedcantilver750mmlongbeams.thumb.jpg.dd3c52ff5b7bcdc12843d401e4d1b467.jpghen table on paper hand towels!

 

 

 

 

Steel column supporting falt slab with welded rebar and couplers.jpg

AoA 

Thanks a lot for sketches and explanation. I have now few queries regarding its implementation via ETABS. Actually I want to design a 30ftx30ft flat slab (Post Tensioned)  with steel columns on four edges only(Two story) .  My queries are:

1) Is this type of modeling possible in ETABS with connection details shown in sketches. I know the shear reinforcement using shear studs could be provided, but as per this design how the connection will be modeled and analyzed?

2) If I dont model the cantiliver sections and just draw slab over steel columns,  will this connection be ok.  Even if not,  can I use the forces (shear and moment) after analysis to manually design the connection as shown in sketch?

3) If I model HSS section as columns and provide I Sections as cantilever, and then draw slab over it,  is this modeling technically ok? 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Salam Arslan,

I don't think that type of modeling is possible in ETABS especially the connection one, PT slab could be modeled in ETABS, you can have Composite beam and column design so you can define composite sections but you will have to check the connection manually after taking forces from ETABS.

 

 

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, waqar saleem said:

Salam Arslan,

I don't think that type of modeling is possible in ETABS especially the connection one, PT slab could be modeled in ETABS, you will have to check the connection manually after taking forces from ETABS.

 

Regards

In that case,  the connection will be designed based on the forces (Moment and shear) in column or from the cantiliver sections. 

Secondly in Etabs if I draw these cantiliver sections with the column,  the punching shear is not calculated(N/C) during slab design.  Is this ok? Will punching shear check be neglected in that case? 

Regards 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are mixing a lot of things up here.... one must first feel comfortable designing a structure by hand, then rely on software. I will carry on with my previous numbering so you see the whole picture.

4. You must ask yourself, could I design a flat slab concrete structure by hand by determining moment and shear coefficients for continuous slab case for vertical gravity loading. This will give you both shear and moment value. Each CODE has rules for splitting the slab into "column strips" and slab strips" to determine width of slab for each hand calc. Decide which code you are going to use and follow its "design rules" for "flat slabs" / "flat plates".

5. With flat slab structure (no down stand beams) you will always require shear reinforcement in successive perimeters in the slab around the column. The exception would be if your column was say very large in plan size, or you thicken the slab around the column. Again, follow code approach, you should be able to do quick check by hand!

6. Next, how is the lateral stability of the structure achieved - shear walls or lift shaft? This is key as all lateral loads will go to these vertical elements via the floor slab diaphragm, limiting lateral load moments on the column at junction with slab. In earthquake regions i would plan lateral stability system first!

7. PT slabs require specialist PT tendons and grouts, quality control etc. They are often used to "thin" the slab section. They are expensive and require specialist installation. If you have all that (not sure if its economical for two storey building slab, unless it’s very heavily loaded, and has large plan area) then I would now even pursue this option. 

8. Instead of PT slab, I would consider down stand beams to cut down slab span. There are various slab types which will span 9m (30'), or a coffered slab (designed same way as flat slab).

9. For your analysis, do not put in the 750mm long cantilevers, and design slab shear around the column.

10. Get the code, then the code handbook, then design. ETABS it seems to me have done a very good selling job in PK!

Design is in three steps: Crawling (college and uni studies), then walking (understand all structural concepts and design concepts by hand) and then running (rely on software only when you can judge if the output is in the "correct ballpark", by looking at the results! 

image.png.69ed824d47e4465b0838ea85c192f894.pnga. Will span say 7-8m (24'), approx 300mm thick,no beams

image.png.e0d8a4b6c09646a370f7d12bb65eaf42.pngb. Will span 10m (30'), 600 o/all thick, beams within depth

 

Or a (c) Traditional beam and slab system will suffice.

Or (d) if you local expertise available, then use PT slabs (the tendons need to be protected during building life from any damage, say someone drilling a hole into the tendon during building life, and also special techniques are required to demolish PT buildings.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/22/2020 at 10:53 PM, Simple Structures said:

PS: I would model the connection same way you would a concrete column/slab connection and then "detail" the connection by hand to achieve the connection behaviour assumed in the analysis.

That is correct. You just model slab to column like normally you would model. Analyse your ETABS model, get maximum shear and moment for the worst cases that would be max tension and max shear. Now you have to provide a mechanism to transfer that moment and shear from the slab to the column.

Which you can do by using weldable rebars. Provide an end plate to column. See the sketch. Sizes where shown are just for example as I have no idea what your loads are.

**Update**

I also edited my sketch to show concrete breakout that you will need to check per ACI Code. It is also a good idea to provide shear ties for that, but you will need to develop Ldh for ties too. Also added circle on weld symbol to show all around welding.

The break out line is show incorrect, as it should start from reinforcing bar,not end of plate. Sorry but hand markups using mouse are tough.

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.