Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Shear transfer through construction joint


MIK
 Share

Recommended Posts

Assalamu Alaikum

I have some confusion about shear transfer through construction joints in rafts

1) Can we use flexural reinforcement at the top and bottom of the raft for transferring shear through the construction joint?

2) If yes than how will be the mechanism?

3) How can we use flexure reinforcement for both flexure and shear action in the context of shear transfer through construction joints? 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shear transfer at construction joint happens through a combination of bearing and shear strength of key where provided. Flexural reinforcement has no role. See also, 

 

Edited by Ayesha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks @Ayesha for your prompt reply.

According to ACI-318-19 section 22.9 

image.png.1cb4d8ddaf552126b0abc513ad0be947.pngimage.png.98105f222cf26d78e4d855c531123ce5.png 

This section is also applicable to construction joints, as highlighted in the above snaps from ACI-318-19. I was asking about Avf in the above equation 22.9.4.2 which is the area of reinforcement crossing the assumed shear plan (in our case interface between old and new concrete). Provided flexural reinforcement is raft is also perpendicular to the assumed shear plane (interface between two concrete pours)

The same problem is discussed in the link below

https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=477681

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can use the recommendations in the paper that allow use of axial compression and rebar perpendicular to crack surface to be accounted.  If I were you, I would just use the conventional method described in the paper and ignore any contribution due to rebar (see snapshot for the method/ equation). 
 Also, I have difference of opinion for your case. I checked the topic at Eng-Tips as the question is explained in much More detail than here (I would suggest you edit your question above and include additional details). The location you have chosen is under compression as directly under columns. You shouldn’t be worried about shear or moment there. 

D3C45703-677F-495E-A17E-F218BC56E076.thumb.jpeg.acece1c53d847dcb92bc9e70f3bef13f.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please share the relevant paper which you have referred in your last reply.

35 minutes ago, Ayesha said:

 Also, I have difference of opinion for your case. I checked the topic at Eng-Tips as the question is explained in much More detail than here (I would suggest you edit your question above and include additional details). 

The topic at Eng-Tips refers to the same issue which is posted by one of my friend, working on the same issue.

Actually the contractor have provided the construction joint at the wrong location with no shear key arrangement.

So, we are going to investigate the shear transfer through the construction joint.

we are applying shear friction concept for transferring shear forces through the construction joint. But there is no clear explanation available about the use of flexural reinforcement in sher friction equation.

My question was can we use Avf equal to flexural reinforcement in the below equation (6) ?

image.png.8f0c06b067ae3e83d90fb78ca1ed46ea.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The paper is the one you referred in Eng-Tips.  
Title: SHEAR TRANSFER IN REINFORCED CONCRETE - RECENT RESEARCH
Date: March-April, 1972
Volume: 17
Issue: 2
Page number: 55-75
Author(s): Alan H. Mattock, Neil M. Hawkins

Download Link:
https://www.pci.org/PCI_Docs/Publications/PCI Journal/1972/March-1972/Shear Transfer in Reinforced Concrete - Recent Research.pdf

You can see page 61 of the PDF to see the definition of items in the equation. Another alternate would be to provide epoxy grout to join the two surfaces on either side of the crack. In that way no calculation is required.

 

Edited by Ayesha
Fixed typo: Epoxy Grout
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the paper link

On 1/2/2021 at 11:07 AM, Ayesha said:

Another alternate would be to provide epoxy grout to join the two surfaces on either side of the crack.

ok. it will be good if it can satisfy shear transfer requirements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course you can with epoxy grout as bond strength is even high than compressive strength of concrete for most epoxy grouts. You have to check the data sheet. The important thing would be surface prep as aggregate would need to be exposed to half depth and extremely good cleaning. Once you have used epoxy, there is no construction joint at that location. Just remember that.

Edited by Ayesha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.