Jump to content
  • Welcome to SEFP!

    Welcome!

    Welcome to our community forums, full of great discussions about Structural Engineering. Please register to become a part of our thriving group or login if you are already registered.

Slab parameters for Open Grid Steel Flooring in ETABs


Osama Anwar
 Share

Recommended Posts

Assalamu Alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh

I'm designing a Industrial building made up of steel which has a open grid steel flooring in one of its floor. I need to know what material properties I need to use and what slab parameter I need to select to model the open grid steel flooring in Etabs. The following site gives an idea about detailing of open grid steel flooring.

Open Grid Steel Flooring – Structural Detailer

Mild Steel Open Steel Flooring Galvanised Or Coloured - Metal Supplies

In material properties I have taken Modulus of Elasticity as 0.00001. Also Specific Weight Density as 0 because I am applying its self weight as shell loads.

And in Slab Property Data I have taken Modelling type as Shell-Thin and Type as Slab and Thickness 1".

Is it alright or I need to change something to better mimic the reality?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem to be approaching your modelling without clear and basic understanding of what constitutes as structural system in this kind of floor.

What I see, when I look at this picture is: a floor in which loads are carried directly by beams, which in turn transfer the forces to girders; beams are laterally braced by cross-members. So, you need to model your beams and girders with line elements.

And why would you take your modulus of elasticity as 0.00001? E is responsible for providing stiffness. If E is 0, it means do not have any structural member! I am sure that is not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wsalaam!

This is basically "Steel Grating" sitting on steel structure. I personally think its not appropriate to call it Open Grid Steel Framing System.

The standard industry practice is that we don't model the grating. You can consider the weight of grating based on manufacturer's catalogue (you can google if you don't have any, as this data is very common). Grating spans one-way and  you can calculate the load based on its span. Normally you will need to provide in-fill beams to meet span requirements against occupancy loads.

The steel that supports this grating will need horizontal (plan) and vertical bracing. Normally for steel, the beam to column connection in major axis is moment, and braced frames are used in minor axis. Very common.

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, UmarMakhzumi said:

Wsalaam!

This is basically "Steel Grating" sitting on steel structure. I personally think its not appropriate to call it Open Grid Steel Framing System.

The standard industry practice is that we don't model the grating. You can consider the weight of grating based on manufacturer's catalogue (you can google if you don't have any, as this data is very common). Grating spans one-way and  you can calculate the load based on its span. Normally you will need to provide in-fill beams to meet span requirements against occupancy loads.

The steel that supports this grating will need horizontal (plan) and vertical bracing. Normally for steel, the beam to column connection in major axis is moment, and braced frames are used in minor axis. Very common.

Thanks.

 

Jazak Allah Umar bhai

I had already considered the weight and taken clear span (5' in my case) from the online sources. I had also provided secondary and tertiary beams for this purpose as my primary beams span are very large (32' in one direction and 70' in other direction). 

What I understand is that I do not need to consider slab for this case, I just have to take loads and directly transfer them to beams.

8 hours ago, Badar (BAZ) said:

You seem to be approaching your modelling without clear and basic understanding of what constitutes as structural system in this kind of floor.

Jazak Allah for the reply Badar bhai

It is class assignment. That's what assignment are for, to build basic understanding.

8 hours ago, Badar (BAZ) said:

And why would you take your modulus of elasticity as 0.00001? E is responsible for providing stiffness. If E is 0, it means do not have any structural member! I am sure that is not the case.

I did that as lecturer told me to do so, but he did not go into much detail that is why I am asking. I have selected suitable steel grating for clear span of 5' using online catalogues and also corresponding weights, deflections are already catered for. I needed to know that can I model it as a slab that would automatically transfer loads to beams? Because assigning loads to hundreds of beams is a hectic job. That is also the reason I took stiffness equal to 0 by taking E=0.

Should I model the slab or just transfer corresponding loads?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One do not start to develop basic understanding by working on a actual structure from the start. If you are at that stage, then you must have studied engineering mechanics, internal distribution of stresses in cross-sections for a particular external force, strength of materials, strength of cross-sections for a particular demand, and methods to estimate the distribution of forces in connected members meant for a structural behavior.

If you are not designing the open floor itself, and your intention is to investigate the girders and columns; and to do that, you want to use area elements so that you do not have to apply gravity loads manually, then you need to ask yourself:

  • Is my floor one-way or two-way?
  • Can my floor transfer moments to supporting members?
  • Do I want to model the self weight of the open floor through the use of area elements?

For one way distribution, you could use deck slab or one way load distribution option. For two way action, add thin shell area elements.

Second point: You can do that by setting a very low value of E, as well as releasing the rotational restraints at the ends of  slab panel.

Third point: Select appropriate thickness for a particular unit weight.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Badar (BAZ) said:

If you are not designing the open floor itself, and your intention is to investigate the girders and columns; and to do that, you want to use area elements so that you do not have to apply gravity loads manually

I only want to investigate loads on beams and columns.

Steel gratings panel are made up of bearing bars and intermediate bars. Bearing bar orientation is perpendicular to the span (c/c distance of adjacent beams) which varies from 2'-5' so I have to subdivide slab in such a way that beams are at 5' c/c in one direction. Length of grating may be equal to span or greater than span. I have not seen it, I know this from web surfing.

21 hours ago, Badar (BAZ) said:
  • Is my floor one-way or two-way?
  • Can my floor transfer moments to supporting members?
  • Do I want to model the self weight of the open floor through the use of area elements?

I don't think it will be able to transfer moments. What do you think? I think it would act as one way. I wanted to model self weight through area element so I took mass of material as 0. 

21 hours ago, Badar (BAZ) said:

For one way distribution, you could use deck slab or one way load distribution option. For two way action, add thin shell area elements.

Second point: You can do that by setting a very low value of E, as well as releasing the rotational restraints at the ends of  slab panel.

Third point: Select appropriate thickness for a particular unit weight.

I am using membrane with E almost equal to zero WITHOUT one way option. Will it do? Isn't deck for composites?

If I am applying self loads through shell loads option i.e. unit weight equal to zero, setting the thickness won't matter. Right?

Thanks for the great explanation. Much appreciated. 

Btw is there a steel frame in your profile picture? I was wondering which steel section we use as bracing in Pakistan? Angle or circular HSS or other?

Edited by Osama Anwar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • Hi there,
      I am interested in performing "Performance Based Design" for a 20 story building. 
      I'll be performing "Non-Linear Static Pushover Analysis" for my model. Until now, I have decided to go with "Displacement Co-efficient method". I will be using ETABS 2017 for performing Pushover Analysis. While assigning plastic hinges, I have an option of using ASCE 41-17 (Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing buildings". I would like to know what would be a better estimate for relative distances for plastic hinges in case of beams, columns. Any input concerning assignment of hinges to beams, columns and shear walls is highly appreciated. Normally it's taken 0.05 and 0.95 or 0.1 and 0.9. What's your opinion on this?
      Secondly, it would be great if someone can recommend me a book or some good source to understand how to characterize building using performance levels. Any sort of help is appreciated.
      I have recently graduated and joined a structural design firm, so kindly guide me, considering me a beginner.

       
      • 2 replies
    • *SEFP Consistent Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Pile Design*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Doc No: 10-00-CD-0007*<br style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#272a34; font-size:14px; text-align:start">*Date: April 16, 2018*

      1.1. FUNCTION OF JOINT

      Beam-column joint must transfer the forces, such as moment, shear and torsion, transferred by the beam to the column so that the structure can maintain its integrity to carry loads for which it is designed.

      Another function of the beam-column joint is to help the structure to dissipate seismic forces so that it can behave in a ductile manner.

      1.2.WHY DO WE CARE

      During an extreme seismic event, the code-based structure is expected to maintain its load-carrying capacity for gravity loads even after the structure deforms into inelastic range so that it does not pose any life safety hazard. Hence, the joint can go through significant degradation of strength and stiffness, and if it fails in shear, or anchorage, the life-safety objective of code cannot be achieved.

      1.3.CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE


      1.4.THINGS TO CONSIDER FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      Longitudinal bars of beams, or slab, must be able to develop their yield stress, so that the beam/slab can transfer moment to joint. It means that longitudinal bars must have adequate development length for hooked bars. This implies that the size of the column must be such that bars can develop their tensile forces. If bars can transfer moment, they can also transfer shear as far as monolithic construction is concerned.


      The shear strength of the joint must enable the transfer of moment and shear through it.



      The joint should be Constructible: Congestion of reinforcement is the main concern.

      1.5.DESIGN SHEAR FOR BEAM COLUMN JOINT

      The design shear for beam-column joint depends upon the relative strength of beam and column at the joint.

       
      • 4 replies
    • *Comments/Observations regarding modelling in ETABS*

      *Doc No: 10-00-CD-0006*

      *Date: May 06, 2017*

      Some of the observations made during extraction of results from ETABS (v 9.7.4), for design of reinforced concrete members, are being share in this article.,

      1) Minimum Eccentricity

      ETABS always considers the minimum eccentricity for selecting the design moment of columns irrespective of the probable behavior of the column, whether short or long column. See section 10.10.6.5 and its commentary of ACI 318-08 which deals with minimum eccentricity of long columns. You should always check the design moments that ETABS uses for columns if you want to bring down the cost of construction.

      2) Unbraced/ Braced Preference

      ETABS always performs analysis of frame as if it is un-braced. You should investigate if the storey under consideration is braced, or un-braced (10.10.5.2), and decide appropriate design moments of columns.

      3) Time Period

      ETABS has a tendency to select a time period of the building that is considerably less than the value obtained by the approximate method, Method A, of the section 1630.2.2  of UBC 97. To quote the FEMA 451 document: ''Because this formula is based on lower bound regression analysis of measured building response in California, it will generally result in periods that are lower (hence, more conservative for use in predicting base shear) than those computed from a more rigorous mathematical model". So, there is no need to use the value of time period that is lot less than Ta. One should always check the time period used by the software; ETABS can overestimate the seismic force by more than 2 times.

      Visit the forum link to read the complete article.
      Link: http://www.sepakistan.com/topic/2300-commentsobservations-regarding-modelling-in-etabs/
      • 0 replies
    • The minimum amount and spacing of reinforcement to be used in structural floors, roof slabs, and walls for control of temperature and shrinkage cracking is given in ACI 318 or in ACI 350R. The minimum-reinforcement percentage, which is between 0.18 and 0.20%, does not normally control cracks to within generally acceptable design limits. To control cracks to a more acceptable level, the percentage requirement needs to exceed about 0.60% (REFRENCE ACI COMMITE REPORT 224R-01)



       

       



       

       

      So according to above statement , should we follow 0.60%, to be on more safe side??



       
      • 12 replies
    • Dear Sir/Madam,

      This email is an invitation for the participation in the First South Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (SACEE-2019) which will be held on 21-22 February 2019 in Karachi, Pakistan. This conference is the inaugural event in this series of conferences which has been constituted under the auspices of South Asia Earthquake Network (SHAKE). The organisers of the conference include NED University, University of Porto, University of Fuzhou, University Roma Tre and Institution of Engineers Pakistan. The conference website can be visited at http://sacee.neduet.edu.pk/.

      Please note that world leading earthquake engineering experts have confirmed their participation in the conference. These include Prof Abdelkrim Aoudia (Italy), Prof Alper Ilki (Turkey), Dr Amod Mani Dixit (Nepal), Prof Bruno Briseghella (Italy), Prof George Mylonakis (UK), Prof Khalid Mosalam (USA), Prof Humberto Varum (Portugal) and many others. The presence of these distinguished experts allows you to exchange your work/issues with them and discuss possibility of any future collaboration. Please note that participation in the conference is strictly based on registration. Early registration in different categories at reduced rates are available till 10 December 2018. Please visit the conference website to see the details and the link for registration.

      If there are any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Conference Secretary at the following address

      Prof. Muhammad Masood Rafi
      Conference Secretary- SACEE-2019
      Chairman
      Department of Earthquake Engineering
      NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi, Pakistan.
      Phone: 0092-21-992-261261 Ext:2605
      Email: rafi-m@neduet.edu.pk
    • What is the Minimum reinforcement For Precast Pile  according to different codes (ACI,BS)??  Pile length is 40 times of pile least dimension . 
      • 1 reply
    • Dear members, I am working on a 10 storied rcc factory building with one basement,  where floor loads are in general 125 psf(Live) . but there are 2 warehouse in the building at ground floor & 10th floor where the Live load of stacked materials are 450psf. I have modeled it and analysed in ETABS. After analysis, seeing the floor displacement for seismic load,  i am in big shock to see the pattern. the displacement pattern suddenly increased hugely & then got normal . if the warehouse load created problem, then why it effected only Ground floor level, not the 10th floor! Please tell me how can i solve it. 
      • 1 reply
    • Asalamualaikum all,

      I have columns which are conflicting with the underground water tank as shown in figure.
       

      So I have decided to make underground water tank base slab as a footing for column. So I import etabs model to safe and just take uniform water load on base slab and point load from columns.

      This is the residential house. The BC is 2tsf. But SAFE is showing tension on the base slab and the thickness from punching is 30''. I believe that thickness is too high. What can be the error? Is this approach is correct for design base slab of ugwt to carry load of two edge columns?
      • 11 replies
    • SAFE perform iterative uplift analysis,any one having experience how to check the results of this analysis???what is the purpose and scope of this analysis???
      • 15 replies
    • Shear wall design
      AOA 

      i am facing problems in shear wall design .what are the pier and spandral ?what will be the difference when we assign pier or spandral? without assigning these the shear wall design is incomplete .

      i am taking about etabsv16

      someone have document about shear wall design plz provide it 

      thank you

       
      • 13 replies
  • Tell a friend

    Love Structural Engineering Forum Of Pakistan? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.